Two pieces of recent COVID-19 legislation provide several generous tax incentives for employers through the payroll tax system. This alert provides a detailed analysis of each of these incentives, including illustrative examples and a comparative summary table for easy reference.
The tax incentives discussed in this article are all newly-enacted, and limited guidance exists. The discussion here is based on our interpretation of the statute and the limited guidance issued by the IRS only through the date of the publication listed above. Much of the guidance issued by the IRS is non-authoritative and is subject to change in the future. Employers should consult their tax advisors before taking advantage of any of these incentives.
Background information on the CARES Act and the FFCRA
Two pieces of recent legislation provide several tax incentives for employers through the payroll tax system. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was signed into law on March 27, 2020, and supplemented the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), signed into law on March 18, 2020. See our analysis of the CARES Act and the FFCRA, as well as on-demand webinars on the CARES Act and FFCRA.
The payroll tax provisions in each piece of legislation include:
- Employee retention credit: A maximum $5,000 per employee refundable payroll tax credit for certain employers that retain employees.
- Employer payroll tax deferrals: Deferral of an unlimited amount of employer Social Security taxes to the end of 2021 and 2022.
- Payroll credit for required sick leave: A refundable payroll tax credit equal to any payments of the new required sick leave.
- Payroll credit for required family leave: A refundable payroll tax credit equal to any payments of the new required family leave.
Each of these incentives provide opportunities for employers to obtain immediate access to cash. When immediate access is not available, employers are permitted to request refunds that the IRS has indicated it will process within two weeks. The CARES Act also created a new Payroll Protection Program (PPP), administered by the Small Business Administration, to provide loans to businesses with less than 500 employees.
While these tax incentives provide a much-needed source of liquidity for many businesses, they have also created a good deal of confusion regarding their application, interaction with each other, and interaction with the small business loan programs. In some cases, the utilization of one program precludes the use of others, and there are anti-duplication rules to prevent duplicate benefits from being claimed. This alert is intended to help address this confusion through a detailed analysis of each of the employer incentives. This includes illustrative examples throughout and a comparative summary table at the conclusion. That table may be especially helpful as a reference guide.
To navigate to a specific section, click the link below. Keep reading normally for the full alert.
- Employee retention credit (CARES Act)
- Employer payroll tax deferral (CARES Act)
- Payroll credit for required paid sick leave (FFCRA)
- Payroll credit for required paid family leave (FFCRA)
Employee retention credit (CARES Act)
The CARES Act created a new employee retention credit to incentivize employers to continue paying employees adversely impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak. The credit is available to eligible entities and is equal to 50% of up to $10,000 of qualified wages per eligible employee paid after March 12, 2020, through Dec. 31, 2020.
Entities eligible for the retention credit
Only those entities which are either (1) carrying on a trade or business during 2020 or (2) a Section 501(c) organization are entitled to the credit. In addition, the eligible entity must be economically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which can be demonstrated in one of two ways:
- The entity’s operations must be fully or partially suspended as a result of a government order that imposes limitations upon travel, commerce, or group meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
- For businesses, there must be a greater than 50% reduction in gross receipts for a calendar quarter when compared to the same quarter in the previous year.
Full or partial suspension
The full or partial suspension must be related to an order, proclamation, or decree from the federal government or any state or local government with jurisdiction over the employer’s operations. The order must be mandatory and not merely a suggestion or recommendation. In certain circumstances, a multi-location employer is permitted to apply procedures from a government order in one jurisdiction to all its locations and treat all locations as fully or partially suspended. Otherwise, a business that is shut down under a government order in one jurisdiction but allowed to fully operate in another jurisdiction is still considered partially shut down due to a government order.
A business deemed essential under the applicable government order is not partially shut down, but such business may qualify under this standard if its suppliers are not deemed essential and are unable to supply critical goods or services. An employer is partially suspended if (1) the government order requires it to suspend a portion of its operations even though it may continue the remainder of its operations (e.g., restaurants must close but carry-out and delivery orders are permitted), (2) its hours are required to be limited, or (3) if employees are not permitted inside of the workplace and are not able to work remotely in a comparable manner. However, an employer is not fully or partially suspended due to a government order even if it must shutdown because its customers cannot frequent the business as a result of a government order. Employers that are essential businesses that are permitted to remain fully operational are not considered fully or partially suspended.
In general, an employer that is fully or partially suspended will remain eligible only until it’s no longer suspended due to the government order.
Reduction in gross receipts
Any employer can also be an eligible employer if it meets the gross receipts test even if its operations are not fully or partially suspended. There is no requirement to show that a reduction in gross receipts is attributable to COVID-19 or a government order. If an employer is eligible under the substantial reduction in gross receipts test, it remains eligible through the quarter in which gross receipts exceed 80% of the gross receipts from the same calendar quarter in the prior year (but in no cases can this extend beyond Dec. 31, 2020). Quarterly gross receipts are not something that most businesses are ordinarily required to measure for income tax purposes and may require additional accounting and tax procedures to determine the amount of gross receipts in the relevant quarters of both 2019 and 2020. Further, an entity will not know whether it will fall below the 50% threshold until the quarter is complete so it may have to delay the application of the credit unless it also qualifies as fully or partially suspended during the quarter. An employer that acquires a business during 2020 can include the gross receipts of the acquired business in its 2019 quarterly gross receipts as long as it can reasonably determine what the prior owner’s gross receipts were for that period. Additionally, all related businesses are required to be combined for purposes of measuring this test. The IRS also plans to issue additional guidance that will allow tax exempt organizations to determine their gross receipts for the purposes of this test.
These tests are illustrated in the examples below:
- Example #1: ABC, Inc. operated a trade or business in 2020 and previous years. As a result of government orders in State X which restricted travel, ABC was required to suspend its operations from March 10, 2020 through April 30, 2020. Assuming all other eligibility requirements are met, ABC is eligible for the credit for wages paid during the first and second calendar quarters of 2020. Note, however, that only wages paid after March 12, 2020, can qualify for the credit. See Example #2 for the application of the gross receipts test.
- Example #2: Assume the same facts in Example #1 and that ABC restores its business operations on May 1, 2020 after the state order is lifted. For the first calendar quarter, ABC’s gross receipts were 85% of gross receipts received for the first quarter in 2019. Gross receipts for the second and third calendar quarters were 45% and 90%, respectively. Because gross receipts fell by more than 50% for the first time in the second quarter, ABC met the gross receipts test for the second quarter of 2020. However, ABC was already an eligible employer for the second quarter because of the state order. Still, meeting the gross receipts test for the second quarter allows ABC to continue to be an eligible employer for the third quarter even though there was no state order during the third quarter. Since gross receipts increased above the 80% threshold in the third quarter, ABC is not an eligible employer for wages paid after the third quarter. As a result, ABC is an eligible employer for the first quarter (partial/full suspension), second quarter (partial/full suspension and gross receipts test), and third quarter (gross receipts test).
- Example #3: Assume the same facts as Examples #1 and 2 except that the third-quarter gross receipts for 2020 are 60% of the gross receipts received for the third quarter in 2019. Since an employer only loses eligibility under the gross receipts test after the quarter in which its gross receipts exceed 80%, ABC is still an eligible employer during the third and fourth quarters. Gross receipts do not have to be determined for the fourth quarter, because even if gross receipts exceed 80% of the gross receipts for the fourth quarter, that really only drives the qualification for the subsequent quarter and wages paid in are never qualified wages.
- Example #4: DEF, LLC operated a trade or business in 2020. As a result of government orders in State Y which restricted travel, DEF partially suspended its operations, suffering a reduction in operating capacity from March 10, 2020 through June 30, 2020. DEF’s gross receipts for each quarter in 2020 when compared to 2019 are as follows: first quarter = 90%, second quarter = 55%, third quarter = 60%, fourth quarter = 80%. Even though DEF’s gross receipts fell a great deal during 2020, no quarter fell below 50% of the gross receipts from the similar quarter during 2019 so the gross receipts test is not met for any quarter. Therefore, DEF is only an eligible employer for the first and second quarter while its business was partially suspended due to the order of State Y.
- Example #5: GHI, Inc. is an automobile repair service business. It is an essential business and is not required to close its locations or suspend its operations. Due to a governmental order that limits travel and requires members of the community to stay at home except for certain essential travel, such as going to the grocery store, GHI’s business has declined significantly. GHI is not considered to have a full or partial suspension of operations due to a governmental order. However, GHI may be considered an eligible employer if it has a significant decline in gross receipts.
- Example #6: JKL, LLC is a software development company that maintains an office in a city where the mayor has ordered that only essential businesses may operate. JKL’s business is not essential under the mayor’s order and must close its office. Prior to the order, all employees at the company teleworked once or twice per week, and business meetings were held at various locations. Following the order, the company ordered mandatory telework for all employees and limited client meetings to telephone or video conferences. JKL’s business operations are not considered to be fully or partially suspended by the governmental order because its employees may continue to conduct its business operations by teleworking.
Businesses not eligible for the credit
The CARES Act created a new Payroll Protection Program to provide loans primarily to businesses with less than 500 employees. Employers that receive this new type of loan — regardless of the date of the loan — are not eligible for the employee retention credit. However, if an employer that has a PPP loan funded and then repays the loan by May 14, 2020 (or any other in accordance with the safe harbor rules of the SBA) will be treated as if the employer did not receive a PPP loan for the purposes of the employee retention credit.
Additionally, the CARES Act directs the Secretary of Treasury to create credit recapture rules, which suggests that even if a PPP loan is received after the employee retention credit has been claimed, the credit must be repaid. There is no guidance to indicate whether interest may be due on these repayments, however, employers who have a reasonable expectation of receiving the credit should not have failure-to-pay or failure-to-deposit penalties attached. Employers treated as a single employer under the aggregation rules are not eligible for the retention credit if any member of the employer’s aggregated group receives a PPP loan.
Federal, state, and local governments, subdivisions, and agencies are not eligible to claim the credit. Certain tribal governments may be eligible with respect to business operations.
Amount of the credit
The credit is determined on a per-employee basis and is equal to 50% of “qualified wages” with respect to eligible employees. Qualified wages include both gross wages subject to FICA tax as well as costs for employer-provided healthcare. Qualified wages cannot exceed $10,000 per employee. In addition, wages must be paid after March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2020 in order to be qualified wages.
The amount of healthcare expenses taken into account generally includes both the portion of the cost paid by the employer and the portion of the cost paid by the employee with pre-tax salary reduction contributions. However, the expenses should not include amounts that the employee paid for with after-tax contributions. For employers with more than 100 employees, all healthcare expenses allocable to time where an employee is not providing service can be included in qualified wages. For example, if an employer furloughs its employees but continues to pay their healthcare expenses, those healthcare expenses cannot be included in qualified wages even though no wages are being paid.
The rules for determining qualified wages differ depending upon whether the employer had more or less than 100 employees on average during 2019 (see “Rules for counting employees” below).
- Rules applicable to employers with 100 or fewer employees: Qualified wages include all wages paid to all employees during a period of full or partial suspension due to a government order or during any quarter that the employer meets the gross receipts reduction test (but still only wages paid after March 12, 2020, can be included for the first quarter). For example, in Example #3 above, ABC was a qualified employer for the first, second, and third quarters and was shut down due to a government order beginning March 10. If it has 100 or fewer employees, all wages and healthcare expenses paid from March 13, 2020 through Sept. 30, 2020, are qualified wages, subject only to the $10,000 limit per employee.
- Rules applicable to employers with more than 100 employees: Qualified wages only include wages that are being paid to employees on account of services not being performed due to the circumstances that cause the entity to be an eligible entity — either on account of a government order or a substantial reduction in gross receipts. Therefore, only an employer that is paying wages on account of employees that are not working for the hours paid can have qualified wages if it has more than 100 employees.
For example, an employer paying an employee for 40 hours despite the employee only actually providing services for 30 hours will be able to claim qualified wages with respect to the 10 hours of non-working time (plus the healthcare expenses allocable to those 10 hours). The same principles apply with respect to salaried employees but the determination of the time where services are not being provided must be made using a reasonable methodology. A methodology will not be considered reasonable if it uses the productivity or output of an employee to estimate the time not worked. For example, if a salaried employee working at home is estimated to be only 80% productive based on the work they are able to accomplish, the 20% of non-productive time cannot be assumed to be time where services are not being provided without further documentation to show that the employee was not actually working. Employers may consider instituting timesheets or other similar reporting mechanisms to contemporaneously track this time.
- To illustrate these concepts, let’s focus back on Example #3 above. In that example, ABC was an eligible employer for the first, second, and third quarters but was only shut down from March 10, 2020 through April 30, 2020. If it has more than 100 employees, only wages paid to employees while they were not working (or who had a reduction in hours) during the shutdown period are qualified wages. Wages paid to employees for services performed (e.g., working from home or those few employees maintaining the business while all others were away) would not be qualified wages. From May 1, 2020 through Sept. 30, 2020, ABC was operating but was still at a reduced capacity. Therefore, any wages or healthcare expenses paid to employees that ABC could not yet bring back to work would be eligible wages. Wages for excess hours not worked for employees who were brought back below their normal level of work (e.g., a full-time hourly employee working 30 hours per week but still getting paid for the 40 hours per week that they weren’t working would cause 10 hours to be excess hours) would also appear to be eligible wages. In any case, wages paid to ABC’s employees for the time they worked during any part of the first, second, or third quarters are not eligible wages.
The following additional rules also apply in determining qualified wages:
- Employers with more than 100 employees may not treat amounts paid to employees for paid time off for vacations, holidays, or sick days as qualified wages. However, employers with 100 or fewer employees are permitted treat these wages as qualified wages.
- Payments, including severance payments, made to former employees after a termination of employment will not be considered qualified wages.
- Employers with more than 100 employees may not treat as qualified wages any increase in wages when compared to the wages paid during the 30 days prior to the point that the employer becomes eligible.
- Qualified wages do not include wages paid to dependents of, or certain other “related parties” of a person that owns, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the employer.
• An employee may not be taken into account for the employee retention credit for any period during which the employer is eligible to claim a work opportunity tax credit for that employee.
- Wages included in the employee retention credit cannot be taken into account for the paid family medical leave credit under Section 45S (note that this credit was originally enacted for 2018 as a part of tax reform and is different than the FFCRA credit for paid family leave discussed below).
- Wages cannot be included in the employee retention credit if they are included in the paid sick leave credit or family medical leave credit enacted by the FFCRA discussed below.
Rules for counting employees
For purposes of determining whether there are more than 100 employees, the rules of Section 4980H apply. These are the same rules that apply for the purposes of determining the number of employees under the Affordable Care Act provisions. In general, only full-time employees are counted which includes an employee who, with respect to any calendar month in 2019, had an average of at least 30 hours of service per week or 130 hours of service in the month. An employer that operated its business for the entire 2019 calendar year determines the number of its full-time employees by taking the sum of the number of full-time employees in each calendar month in 2019 and dividing that number by 12. Employers that began their business in 2019 only count full-months that they were in operation and those that began in 2020 use a similar rule but applied to current year employees.
In counting employees, the aggregation rules of Sections 52(a), (b), 414(m), 414(o) also apply. Therefore, all entities treated as a single employer under those sections are considered one employer for the employee retention credit. These aggregation rules are the same rules that apply in determining whether a business is a small business for various other income tax accounting concepts, including the exemption from the business interest limitation of Section 163(j) and whether the business qualifies for the small business exception which would allow the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting to be followed. Even though these rules can be very complex, many businesses will have already made these determinations for other purposes and may simply need to refer back to previous analyses.
Cash flow from the credit
The retention credit is a refundable payroll tax credit. An employer is permitted to retain payroll taxes and withholdings up to the amount of the credit in order to take advantage of the credit contemporaneously with when wages are paid. An employer is permitted to retain any amounts that would otherwise be due to the federal government, which consists of employee and employer Social Security taxes, employee and employer Medicare taxes, and employee federal income tax withholdings. The retained amounts can be related to any wages paid for the period and do not need to relate to the qualified wages.
To the extent that there are not enough withholdings to cover the full amount of the credit, the employer can either (1) wait until the end of the quarter and request a cash refund with its quarterly payroll tax return or (2) file Form 7200 to obtain an advance refund for the credit. Form 7200 can be filed as late as the end of the month following the end of the quarter but can also be filed multiple times during the quarter in order to obtain refunds more contemporaneously with when the qualified wages are paid. The only way to file Form 7200 is via fax. The IRS has indicated that it expects to process refund claims within about two weeks.
The IRS has issued Notice 2020-22, providing that an employer will not be subject to any failure to deposit penalties with respect to payroll taxes retained in an amount equal to the anticipated credit. It’s not clear how this penalty relief will apply in situations where an employer miscalculates the available credit or where it loses its eligibility at a later date as a result of obtaining a Payroll Protection Program loan as discussed above. It’s also not clear how the failure to pay penalty would apply as well.
Employers should consider whether the possibility of failure to deposit penalties being assessed on any required credit repayments would be mitigated by requesting advance payments of credits rather than retaining payroll taxes. While the instructions to Form 7200 state that employers “should first reduce…employment tax deposits to account for the credits,” the language doesn’t prevent the employer from filing Form 7200 instead of reducing deposits. Employers without good data to calculate credits or that are at a high risk of becoming disqualified may also consider only taking advantage of the credit by requesting refunds on quarterly payroll tax filings to potentially avoid the imposition of additional penalties. Further penalty relief guidance is expected from the IRS to clarify these matters.
In any case, the credit is reported and reconciled on each quarterly payroll tax filing. The IRS has indicated that reporting for the credit will begin with the second-quarter payroll tax filings, so employers cannot request refunds by claiming the credit on first-quarter payroll tax filings. All qualified wages for both the first and second quarters are reported on the second quarter Form 941.
Employers using PEOs and other third-party payers
The common-law employer of the employee who is paid qualified wages is entitled to the retention credit. This is true regardless of whether the employer uses a third-party payer (such as a payroll service provider, professional employer organization, certified professional employer organization, or Section 3504 Agent) to report and pay federal employment taxes. The third-party payer is not entitled to claim the credit regardless of whether the third party is considered an “employer” for other purposes.
A common-law employer that is a client of a third-party payer can retain applicable withholding taxes that the third-party payer would have otherwise collected. If the third-party payer files aggregate payroll tax filings for multiple clients, it would reconcile all such amounts from all clients on that filing.
A common-law employer is also permitted to request the advance payment of the retention credit on Form 7200 even if its employment tax return information is included on the aggregate employment tax return of a third-party payer. The employer is required to provide the third-party payer copies of the Form(s) 7200 so it can reconcile the credits on the aggregate employment tax return. The third-party payer also may request an advance refund on its client’s behalf.
A third-party payer is required to maintain a documentation regarding its client’s eligibility for any credits claimed so the parties must work closely together to fully take advantage of the retention credit.
Impact of credit on taxable income
If the employer is subject to the income tax (not a 501(c) entity), the amount of the credit must be included in the employer’s taxable income. As a result, the net benefit of the credit is reduced by the entity’s marginal tax rate. Still, the business is permitted to obtain the full cash benefit of the credit through the payroll tax system, and any additional income tax is paid through estimated taxes, which may not be due until much later than when the credit is received. The impact of this income adjustment may also be deferred to the extent that it reduces net operating losses that cannot be carried back because income does not exist in the previous five years.
State income tax consequences from receiving the credit will vary. Many states permit a subtraction for the increase to income resulting from employment-related federal tax credits, but it’s possible that some states would need to update their laws to cover this particular credit.
- Example #7: MNO Foundation employed an average of 50 workers in 2019. On April 4, 2020, a government “shelter in place” order required MNO to temporarily close its doors and it was not able to operate on a remote basis in a comparable manner. That order ended on June 30, 2020, and MNO re-started its activity on that date. The foundation continued to pay wages to its 50 employees, none of whom were eligible for sick pay or family medical pay. During the shutdown, MNO paid $50,000 in wages ($1,000 per employee) and continued paying healthcare insurance premiums on behalf of employees in an amount of $20,000 ($400 per employee).
- Because MNO’s employees in 2019 averaged less than 100, all wages paid for the period during the shutdown are qualified wages. This amount is $1,400 per employee or $70,000 in total. The credit is determined on the basis of 50% of qualified wages, so the amount of the credit allowed with respect to each employee is $700. Because 50 employees were paid wages after the shutdown and no employee’s wages exceeded $10,000, the amount of the credit is $35,000.
- The withholding for the payroll paid during this period was $11,000. MNO may retain the $11,000 and not deposit such amounts when it would otherwise have been required to deposit those amounts with the federal government. The remaining $24,000 credit can either be claimed as a cash refund on a payroll tax return or MNO can file Form 7200 to obtain an advance payment of the excess credit even before payroll tax return is filed. Note that these results could differ slightly depending on how frequently MNO deposits taxes with the government and what amount of credit is generated during each deposit period.
- Example #8: PQR, LLC employs more than 100 employees and was partially shut down beginning March 12, 2020, as a result of a government order. During that time, it was able to maintain some operations, by employees working on a remote basis, but certain employees who weren’t able to work remotely because direct customer-facing operations weren’t permitted to continue during the shutdown period. From March 13 to March 31, 30 employees who were no longer working but were paid $1,000 and $400 of health plan expenses were still paid. All other employees were working remotely on a full-time basis.
- Because PQR is an employer with more than 100 employees, qualified wages only include wages and healthcare plan expenses paid to employees who weren’t working. Each employee who was not working had qualified wages of $1,400 during this period. As this is less than the $10,000 limit, PQR is eligible for a 50% credit on all of these wages, or $21,000 ($1,400 * 30 employees not working * 50%). PQR had total payroll taxes and withholding of $300,000 for the period (including payroll taxes and withholdings on wages for employees who were still working) so it can simply not deposit $21,000 of that amount in order to obtain immediate access to the credit.
The IRS has issued Notice 2020-22, discussing how employers can retain payroll tax and other withholdings without being penalized, a frequently asked question list discussing a variety of rules, Form 7200 and its instructions discussing advance repayments, and a draft of the updated Form 941 and its instructions. The IRS continues to update the FAQs. While the FAQs are merely informal guidance posted to the IRS website, it does confirm the current interpretations of several key questions by the IRS. It is unclear whether the IRS will undertake a more formal guidance project for the retention credit, but we would expect future guidance to closely follow the logic of these FAQs.
The IRS Coronavirus Tax Relief site will continue to be updated with all guidance on the employee retention credit.
Employer payroll tax deferral (CARES Act)
Unlike the employee retention credit that’s limited to employers who are affected in two defined ways by COVID-19, almost all employers are eligible to defer the 6.2% FICA portion (Social Security) of the employer’s employment taxes for any payroll paid on March 27, 2020 through Dec. 31, 2020. This rule permits eligible employers to pay 50% of the deferred amount on Dec. 31, 2021, and the remaining 50% on Dec. 31, 2022. Governments and government agencies appear to be eligible for this deferral despite being ineligible for other programs under the CARES Act and FFCRA.
The payroll tax deferral may be calculated prior to calculating any of the other payroll tax credits discussed in this alert. By calculating the deferral-amount first, an employer is able to maximize the cash flow from each of these incentives. For example, assume that an employer had $50,000 in total payroll tax deposits, $10,000 of the deposits were eligible for deferral (as the employer’s share of Social Security), and it was eligible for $45,000 of other payroll tax credits. This employer is permitted to retain the $10,000 under this deferral provision, retain the remaining $40,000 of withholdings under the payroll tax credit provisions, and then apply for a refund for the remaining $5,000 of payroll tax credits. By doing this, the employer obtains the full $55,000 of cash flow benefits. If the tax credits were applied first, the employer would have absorbed most or all of the amount that would have been eligible for deferral, leaving little or nothing left to defer.
The IRS has indicated that the payroll tax deferral will begin to get reported on the second- quarter payroll tax filings (Form 941). While first-quarter payroll tax forms will not be updated, the IRS has indicated that instructions are forthcoming with respect to how to report this deferral for the first quarter.
An employer that receives loan forgiveness under the Payroll Protection Program or under Section 1109 of the CARES ACT is not eligible for the deferral of payroll taxes. However, the employer only becomes ineligible to defer for periods following the date in which it has been notified by its lender that it has been approved for loan forgiveness. Therefore, employers are permitted to immediately take advantage of the payroll tax deferral starting on March 27 but may not continue to defer payroll tax on deposits due after the date that it becomes disqualified. The deferral for periods prior to the date in which the employer has been notified that it has been approved for loan forgiveness is not lost; any amounts deferred up to that point are due on Dec. 31, 2021 and Dec. 31, 2022 under the general rules discussed above.
The IRS has indicated that only amounts that have not yet been paid are eligible to be deferred. Therefore, employers are not permitted to catch-up on deferrals that they may have been eligible for at a later date by claiming a credit on a payroll tax filing for amounts previously paid even though the employer may have been eligible for deferral on that amount. It is critical that employers closely scrutinize any payroll tax filings, including those done by a third-party payer, to ensure that they are timely taking advantage of this provision.
Likewise, an equivalent portion of self-employment taxes is eligible for deferral. The self-employed individual is permitted to adjust estimated tax payments for 2020 to take this into account. The same Payroll Protection Program limitations applies to self-employed individuals.
The IRS has issued an FAQ document and a draft of the updated Form 941 and its instructions discussing a variety of rules. The IRS Coronavirus Tax Relief site will continue to be updated with all guidance on the payroll tax deferral.
Payroll credit for required paid sick leave (FFCRA)
The paid sick leave credit is also a refundable payroll tax credit similar to the employee retention credit. The credit is allowed in an amount equal to 100% of the qualified sick leave wages paid by the employer during 2020. Qualified sick leave wages only include those wages required to be paid by an employer under the FFCRA. An employer who voluntarily pays sick leave, pays sick leave prior to the April 1, 2020 effective date, or pays an amount in excess of the required amount is not eligible credits on those amounts. In addition to the credit, employers are not subject to payroll taxes on qualified wages. The 6.2% Social Security tax is entirely abated while the 1.45% Medicare tax is still assessed but an equivalent amount is added to the credit, thereby negating its impact. In effect, this credit is meant to entirely make the employer whole with respect to those wages that the FFCRA required it to pay.
In general, only employers with less than 500 employees are required to provide such sick leave. Under the FFCRA, the counting of employees and the aggregation of separate employers as a single employer is determined under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family Medical Leave Act. This is a different approach to counting and aggregation than applies for the employee retention credit. See the Department of Labor FAQ for details of these rules.
The FFCRA requires an employer to continue the pay of employees under certain circumstances but they are not required to pay any more than $511 per day. These circumstances include employees that (1) are subject to a federal, state, or local quarantine isolation order related to COVID-19; (2) have been advised by a healthcare provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19; or (3) are experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and are seeking a medical diagnosis. The cap on pay is reduced to $200 for employees that are (1) caring for an individual subject to a quarantine isolation order or who has been advised to self-quarantine (as discussed above), or (2) caring for the employee’s son or daughter if the school or place of care of the son or daughter has been closed, or the childcare provider of such son or daughter is unavailable due to COVID-19 precautions. In both circumstances, wages are only required to be paid (and employers are eligible for the credit) with respect to a maximum of 10 days (or 80 hours) for all of 2020. Employers are permitted to pay amounts in excess of these limits, but those amounts wouldn’t be eligible for credits.
Amounts paid up to the $200 daily limit (or $511, where applicable) are fully eligible for the 100% credit. In addition, a proportionate share of healthcare expenses (determined in the same manner as discussed above with respect to the employee retention credit) is creditable on top of the $200 or $511 daily limit. With the 10-day limit taken into consideration, the maximum credit is $2,000 or $5,110, plus the amount of healthcare expenses allocable to those 10 sick days (plus the Medicare taxes on those wages as discussed above). The amount of the credit is required to be included in the taxable income of the employer, which effectively negates the deduction claimed for the underlying wage and healthcare expenses.
The credit is not allowed to the federal government, the government of any state or political subdivision, or any of their respective agencies or instrumentalities. However, not-for-profit entities (501(c) organizations) are eligible for the credit. Wages included in this credit may not be included in any other employment-related credits such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit or the employee retention credit.
An employer is able to obtain cash with respect to the credit using the same procedures as with the employee retention credit discussed above. That is, it can retain any payroll taxes and withholdings otherwise required to be deposited in an amount up to its anticipated credit (including payroll taxes and withholdings on amounts unrelated to qualified sick leave). If there aren’t sufficient payroll taxes and withholdings to cover the entire credit, it can either file Form 7200 to obtain an advance repayment of the credit or claim a refund with its quarterly payroll tax return. Common-law employers using third-party payers are eligible for the credit. See the discussion on the employee retention credit above for further details.
The IRS has issued a detailed FAQ on this credit, Form 7200 and its instructions discussing advance repayments, and a draft of the updated Form 941 and its instructions. The IRS Coronavirus Tax Relief site will continue contain all up-to-date guidance.
- Example #9: STU, LLC pays $100 of sick leave to one employee for 10 days, paying $1,000 of wages in total. For that 10-day period, STU also pays $100 of healthcare expenses determined by dividing its total healthcare expenses for the year pro rata among all employees and then prorating the expenses for this one employee pro rata among the total days that the employee would have ordinarily worked during the period. When STU paid the wages, it withheld $200 of income taxes, $14.50 of Medicare taxes, and $62 of Social Security taxes. STU doesn’t owe employer Social Security taxes on these wages but does owe $14.50 in employer Medicare taxes. The healthcare expenses are a tax-free benefit, and no employment taxes are due on this amount. Therefore, STU had a total cash expenditure of $1,114.50 (net pay of $723.50 to the employee, $276.50 of employee withholdings, $14.50 of employer Medicare tax, and $100 of healthcare expenses).
- STU’s paid sick leave credit for this employee is $1,114.50 consisting of $1,000 of wages plus the $100 of healthcare expenses plus the $14.50 of employer Medicare taxes. STU is able to retain up to $1,114.50 of payroll tax and withholdings from all employees in order to take advantage of this credit. If this was STU’s only employee and no other wages were paid, then STU could retain the $291 otherwise owed to the federal government and then either apply for an advance refund for the remaining $823.50 using Form 7200 or wait until the end of the quarter and apply for a cash refund as a part of the payroll tax filing process.
Payroll credit for required paid family leave (FFCRA)
The family leave credit works in an almost identical manner to the sick leave credit, as it is also a credit equal to 100% of any wages and healthcare expenses that an employer is required to pay under the FFCRA. An employer is only required to pay up to $200 per day under the required paid family leave, and the tax credit is limited to this amount. The only category of employee that’s eligible for paid family leave under FFCRA are those who are unable to perform services (including telework) because of a need to care for a child whose school or place of care is closed or whose childcare provider is unavailable due to COVID-19. Any wages paid in excess of $200 are not eligible for the credit. Any healthcare expenses are creditable in addition to the $200 per day, and the credit is increased by Medicare taxes owed on qualified wages. The maximum limit is $10,000 (which represents the 10 weeks of paid family leave, measured at five days per week, at $200 per day required to be provided by the FFCRA) plus healthcare expenses and the Medicare tax.
All of the provisions applicable to the sick leave credit discussed above apply to the paid family leave credit as well, including employee counting and aggregation, the method in which the credit is converted to cash, the fact that qualified wages are not subject to employer Social Security taxes, and the treatment of common-law employers and third-party payers. The calculations in Example #7 above would work in the same manner for the family leave credit as well.
The IRS guidance listed above with respect to the sick leave credit also covers the family leave credit.